ISLAMABAD: Minister for Law and Justice Farogh Naseem has said that Pakistan implemented almost all points of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) to come out of its grey list, hoping the forum would not be used for any political move.
Pakistan’s case with the FATF would be a test case to gauge the forum’s fairness as “out of 27 points, Pakistan has implemented 26. The international watchdog needs to apply the laws to all countries without any prejudice,” he said in an exclusive interview with Turkish state news agency Anadolu on the sidelines of an event in Istanbul.
“Even the FATF people are good people. I’m not being critical about them, but as long as these (FATF) standards are universally applied, and not applied to only Pakistan, and as long as there is no international politics, then we welcome FATF. Let it be applied to everyone,” he said, when asked why Pakistan was still on the list. “There should be no international politics, but FATF is being used to arm twist. Then what can we say?”
The France-based FATF, founded in 1989 on the initiative of the G7, an organisation of the world’s seven largest advanced countries, monitors countries’ money flow and penalizes those whose financial systems are abused for money laundering and terrorism activities.
“I think we have met all objectives. At the (FATF) October session, Pakistan is going to give a very good roundup of whatever it has done,” Farogh Naseem said.
He proposed the establishment of a joint legal forum between Pakistan and Turkey besides intern exchange programmes and the sharing of experiences between lawyer communities of the two countries.
He said Pakistani and Turkish lawyers were “capable of fighting their own cases at all forums.”
In a conversation with a group of Turkish lawyers hosted by second number Bar Association of Istanbul in honour of the minister, Farogh Naseem said former judges and lawyers of the two countries could come together and the two countries could together fight cases of a commercial nature in the international arena.
Referring to illegal immigration to Turkey, he said officials from Pakistan and Turkey were “working on a daily basis to cease this problem.”
He also shared in detail the “transformation taking place in Pakistan” with regard to the delivery of justice. His ministry, he said, has proposed around 650 amendments to the Pakistan National Assembly to make the dispensation of justice “fast and durable.”
He said earlier that it would “take four to seven years for a court to decide” about the letter of administration or a succession certificate.
“Then we made an attempt with the Civil Procedure Court. As you know that in India and Pakistan, it takes about 20 to 30 years before any civil dispute is settled. The problem is not just in Pakistan, but in many other countries. So what we did is that we made amendments, and those amendments ensure that a civil case would be tried within one year. It is working in Islamabad, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. In Punjab, there is a little problem,” he added.
Farogh Naseem said women, whether rich or poor, educated or uneducated, can file a case with regard to property rights with female ombudsmen, who are “available all over Pakistan.”
“Those women ombudsmen would decide their cases in between three to six months. So again, a great expedition (of case disposal) is available as far as that is concerned.” He said many amendments have been brought to “revamp the criminal justice system of Pakistan.”
“We have proposed about 650 amendments, and I think it’ll take a few months before they had been passed by the National Assembly and the Senate,” he said.
“Once it is done, a criminal trial, which takes years, will finish in nine months. These are matters which are not transformed in two or three years,” he said, citing the UK as an example, where civil law reforms took about 20 years.
Farogh Naseem claimed that the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) government developed these reforms in a “record time,” adding, “But it will take a little time for the courts and the lawyers and the litigants to adjust with these reforms.”
On the issue of an anti-blasphemy law in the country, Farogh Naseem said: “I need to make clear for the Pakistani government, Prime Minister Imran Khan and myself; we are in no mood to undo or repeal the blasphemy laws. We will not do it. We will not repeal the blasphemy laws. Yes, if there is abuse in the system, then abuses are to be pointed out.”
He added that in three years of Imran Khan’s government, there have been “hardly any FIRs (first information reports) or challans (charge-sheet) produced in blasphemy cases” in Pakistan.
However, pointing to criticism by Western capitals against this law in Pakistan, he questioned the silence of these countries over Kashmir.
“Why aren’t they talking about the human rights abuses in Kashmir? Why aren’t they saying something about blatant human rights abuse by India in Kashmir? Why not a single word?” he said, even asking why India was not under the radar of FATF.
He said Pakistan was a “responsible state” when asked about the review of a case pertaining to Kulbhushan Jadhav, an Indian spy who is in Pakistani custody.
“Pakistan is a responsible state. Pakistan is a party to the Vienna Convention. So if it is a party to the Vienna Convention, it means that the International Court of Justice [ICJ] would have jurisdiction with regard to any issues of consular access,” the minister said regarding the case of Jadhav, who was arrested by Pakistan in early 2016 and was sentenced to death a year later for alleged “subversive activities against Pakistan.”
“With regard to Jadhav, India lost the main case. Because the main prayer (submission) made by India (before the ICJ) was that he should be released…that he should be acquitted and released,” he said.
“(But) that prayer was dismissed by the ICJ. It is only this tiny part of the case that went against Pakistan, and that is with regard to consular access. And we have given him the consular access not once, but many times. And we’ve not only done that; we’ve complied with the ICJ’s judgments by legislating an effective review and reconsideration law,” Farogh Naseem said.
The minister said, “That effective review and reconsideration law gives Jadhav the right to file a case in the Pakistani high courts and the Pakistani high courts are now possessed with such a law and the case. They are in the process of deciding, in terms of the directions which had been given by the ICJ, which is that there should be a review and reconsideration mechanism and that has been done”.
To a question about Kashmir, he said “Pakistan will not undo the Shimla Agreement,” when asked about India scrapping the semi-autonomous status of the disputed territory of Jammu and Kashmir territory in 2019.
“Pakistan believes in the various resolutions which have been passed by the United Nations Security Council [on Kashmir]. Pakistan is a responsible state, unlike India, which is a rogue state. India has violated the Shimla pact and the United Nations Security Council resolutions blatantly, and therefore, it is the responsibility of the United Nations to take action,” Farogh Naseem said.
“It is more than Pakistan’s problem. It is now the writ of the United Nations which is at stake. The United Nations cannot see that its writ has been completely tarnished by the Indian government. There is a problem with regard to the functioning of the United Nations, and the United Nations will have to really take this up,” he added.
In view of India’s Aug 5, 2019 move on Kashmir, Farogh Naseem noted that “it is a test for the United Nations more than anything else.” Law Minister said Pakistan has invited international journalists to visit both countries - Pakistan and India. “We allow our security staff to take them to the Azad Kashmir area, and they are very happy to report that there is no abuse, whereas the Indian government does not let them go [to Kashmir],” he claimed.—APP